Re: [NTG-context] ∫ and $\intop$ is not displayed correctly compared to $\int$.

2011-12-11 Thread Philipp A.
↔{\xleftrightarrow} \catcode`√=\active \def√{\sqrt} PS: i recently posted two questions to this list which i got no replies to:“simplefonts: math in headers” and“headers: numberconversion=something or \definestructureconversionset” do you see them or did they get lost in transmission

Re: [NTG-context] ∫ and $\intop$ is not displayed correctly compared to $\int$.

2011-12-11 Thread Paul Menzel
and mathematical documents: \catcode`→=\active \def→{\xrightarrow} \catcode`↔=\active \def↔{\xleftrightarrow} \catcode`√=\active \def√{\sqrt} Sorry for being a noob. I thought for the first three that is somehow done already. If not, such a mechanism would indeed be useful. PS: i recently posted

Re: [NTG-context] ∫ and $\intop$ is not displayed correctly compared to $\int$.

2011-12-11 Thread Aditya Mahajan
→{\xrightarrow} \catcode`↔=\active \def↔{\xleftrightarrow} \catcode`√=\active \def√{\sqrt} Have a look at char-def.lua. All the symbol mappings are defined there. Please feel free to complete the table (it is a boring and time consuming process, and I have only managed to cover about half of the table

[NTG-context] extentable arrows

2006-06-28 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Hi, Does ConTeXt have anything equivalent to xleftarrow, xrightarrow of amsmath. Basically, I need a command that can do A \xleftarrow[subscript]{superscript} B should give superscript A --- B subscript and similar for xrightarrow, xleftrightarrow, xLeftarrow, xRightarrow

Re: [NTG-context] extentable arrows

2006-06-28 Thread Aditya Mahajan
for xrightarrow, xleftrightarrow, xLeftarrow, xRightarrow and xLeftRightarrow. The closest that I could come to it was (only for superscripts) \def\xrightarrow#1{\buildrel{#1}\over\longrightarrow} But this is not extendable. \xrightarrow{big superscipt} Any suggestions? This is how it is defined